Eric Trump has publicly defended the construction of a new ballroom at the White House, calling it the “most incredible gift” from his father, former President Donald Trump. In an interview with Newsmax, he dismissed allegations from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries that the project is a pay-for-play scheme. Jeffries has raised concerns about the funding of the ballroom, which is estimated to cost $250 million.
During the interview, Eric Trump emphasized that his father’s initial campaign was self-funded. He remarked, “He forgets about the fact that my father donates his salary to charitable causes—the first president to ever do that.” He believes the ballroom will serve as a significant asset for the country, contributing to both security and hospitality needs.
The ballroom, which is being financed through private donations, aims to prevent costly off-site events. Eric Trump stated, “From a security standpoint, this thing will actually pay for itself many times over.” He criticized the underutilization of the East Wing, asserting that the new hall will feature “vaulted windows, stone columns, chandeliers, marble work, and ornate plaster molding.” He described it as “one of the most spectacular ballrooms ever built in the world.”
Jeffries has accused the former president of “running the largest pay-to-play scheme in the history of the country,” suggesting that the donations for the project could be coming from individuals seeking influence with the government. He called for an investigation into the funding, stating it is “highly doubtful” that the project is legal.
In contrast, Eric Trump maintained that his father’s record of achievements speaks for itself. He expressed confidence that the ballroom will be a valuable addition to the White House. The controversy surrounding the project highlights the ongoing political tensions as both sides present their perspectives on the funding and purpose of this significant construction.
As discussions continue, the implications of this ballroom’s funding and construction will likely remain a focal point in political discourse leading up to future elections.
