The concept of vertical morality sheds light on the complex relationship between Christian beliefs and certain political ideologies, particularly among supporters of the MAGA movement. This framework posits that ethical standards are dictated by an external authority, often perceived as divine, which can lead to contradictions between the teachings of love and mercy found in Christianity and the support for policies that may seem harsh or unkind.
Many Americans struggle to reconcile the teachings of Jesus, who emphasized love and compassion for the oppressed, with the political positions taken by some Christian communities. This contradiction raises important questions about the nature of morality and its influence on modern politics.
According to advocates and former members of fundamentalist communities, vertical morality operates on the premise that moral behavior is defined by what an authoritative figure, such as God, decrees. As one advocate noted, “Vertical morality teaches that authority, power, and a moral code come from ‘above’—an external superior who designates rules that must be obeyed.” This perspective can manifest in both religious and political contexts, where obedience to authority often takes precedence over empathy or compassion.
The Contrast Between Vertical and Horizontal Morality
In contrast to vertical morality, horizontal morality focuses on the well-being of individuals and communities. Advocates explain that those who adhere to horizontal morality prioritize the impact of their actions on others, regardless of their beliefs. “Someone with vertical morality may help someone in need because they believe that’s what God wants them to do, whereas someone with horizontal morality may help that same person for the benefit of the individual in need,” explained Ajoy Klinger Cain, a notable voice in this discourse.
This distinction is not just academic; it reflects broader implications for societal behavior. Many advocates argue that the emphasis on vertical morality has led to a neglect of compassion and empathy in favor of strict adherence to perceived biblical mandates. Malynda Hale, executive director of The New Evangelicals, a nonprofit advocating for inclusivity and justice in Christianity, stated, “Vertical morality has caused white conservative, MAGA-aligned Christianity to completely abandon the core of Christ’s teachings.”
The teachings of Jesus, such as those found in Matthew 25, emphasize the importance of caring for the marginalized. “What you did for the least of these, you did for me,” illustrates that loving one’s neighbor equates to fulfilling one’s duty to God. Yet, the application of vertical morality can result in policies that are in direct opposition to this message, creating a paradox that many find difficult to navigate.
Political Implications of Vertical Morality
The current political landscape highlights how vertical morality can lead to a dangerous weaponization of faith. Advocates argue that some conservative Christian nationalists interpret their political alignment as divinely sanctioned, viewing opposition as inherently evil. “What’s interesting is that Jesus taught a compassionate, flexible, grace-filled view of what it means to live a life loving God,” noted Hale. Yet, many within this movement appear more influenced by Old Testament teachings and doctrines like theonomy, which advocates for the application of biblical law in contemporary governance.
This interpretation can lead to a desensitization toward suffering and a dismissal of the complexities inherent in social justice. “Vertical morality frames unquestioning obedience as the highest virtue,” Klinger Cain stated, pointing out that this mindset can undermine empathy and lead to harsh punitive measures against those deemed non-compliant with societal rules, regardless of the larger ethical implications.
The implications of these beliefs extend into public policy, particularly during the Trump administration, where some MAGA supporters justified exclusionary policies based on a skewed interpretation of morality. Ajoy emphasized that this approach often paints groups such as immigrants and LGBTQ individuals as threats, using fear and misinformation to justify cruelty in the name of ‘tough love.’
As discussions surrounding vertical morality continue, it is essential to understand that while it can provide a sense of certainty and clarity for followers, it often neglects the moral complexities of modern society. Advocates argue that embracing a more nuanced approach—one that balances vertical and horizontal moral frameworks—can foster a more compassionate and inclusive community.
In summary, the paradox of Christian support for MAGA politics can be attributed to the prevalent belief in vertical morality, which prioritizes obedience to divine authority over the well-being of individuals. Addressing these contradictions is crucial for fostering a more empathetic political discourse that aligns more closely with the teachings of Jesus.
