A recent commentary by Deviana Dewi, a PhD candidate at Johns Hopkins University, highlights the current challenges facing the values of freedom and equal opportunity in the United States. Dewi, originally from Indonesia, reflects on her experiences as an international student and raises critical concerns about proposed policies that could undermine these foundational principles.
Dewi’s academic journey began with a fascination for American universities, known for their contributions to knowledge and innovation, from the moon landing to advancements in medicine. This prestige stems from a long-standing tradition of government support for university research, rooted in the post-World War II era. In 1945, Vannevar Bush, a wartime science advisor, articulated the importance of federal investment in research through his influential report, *Science, The Endless Frontier*. He argued that such support was vital for national security and public welfare.
At the heart of the American ethos is a commitment to freedom, a concept Dewi underscores by quoting Pope John Paul II: “Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought.” This perspective emphasizes the need for a moral framework to guide individual choices, which is where the law plays a crucial role. Dewi suggests that the law serves to uphold the integrity of truth and ensures that individuals can distinguish right from wrong.
In her analysis, Dewi draws attention to recent political rhetoric that challenges the rule of law. She expresses concern over political leaders who place themselves above the law, undermining the essential principles of democracy. Her observations reveal a growing trend in political discourse that prioritizes party loyalty over constructive dialogue, often leading to partisanship rather than rational debate.
Dewi articulates her worries about recent proposals, such as a $100,000 application fee for H-1B visas, aimed at skilled foreign workers. This fee, designed to encourage employers to prioritize American workers, raises significant concerns about equal opportunity. Dewi argues that the U.S. job market has historically thrived on the contributions of both American and foreign talent. For instance, the introduction of the H-1B visa program in 1990 has been instrumental in attracting global innovators like Elon Musk, who have gone on to create successful companies that bolster the U.S. economy.
Moreover, the proposed American Tech Workforce Act, which would eliminate the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program for international students, poses another threat to the values of meritocracy and fairness. Dewi highlights that the OPT program provides vital opportunities for international graduates to gain work experience in the U.S., often serving as a pathway to H-1B visas. By raising barriers for skilled workers, these policies could drive talent away to countries like the United Kingdom or Canada, which are currently enhancing their immigration pathways.
As an advocate for international students, Dewi calls on her peers and the public to engage with their elected representatives. She emphasizes that voicing concerns directly to lawmakers is crucial, especially for those whose perspectives are often overlooked in policy discussions. By participating in the democratic process, individuals can help ensure that their values are represented.
In reflecting on her own experiences, Dewi articulates a broader message of hope. She identifies the ongoing struggle for justice and truth as paramount, asserting that hope is necessary for meaningful action. As the world looks to the U.S. as a beacon of freedom and opportunity, Dewi’s insights serve as a reminder of the importance of upholding these values for all individuals, regardless of their background.
In conclusion, as the landscape of American policy continues to evolve, the fundamental principles of freedom, equality, and opportunity must remain at the forefront of national discourse. Dewi’s perspective as an international student enriches the conversation and underscores the need for vigilance in protecting these ideals.
