UPDATE: Plainville’s decision to skip its iconic nativity scene this year has ignited fierce controversy in the community. The absence of the display, which has been a staple in Veterans Memorial Park for over 25 years, has drawn sharp criticism from local Republicans and raised questions about religious representation in public spaces.
Earlier today, the Plainville Republicans took to Facebook, posting multiple updates that collectively garnered nearly 500 reactions and 150 comments. Many supporters expressed disappointment over the missing nativity scene, emphasizing its cultural significance during the holiday season. One post pointedly stated, “The town was not asked by anyone to review the policy nor have there been any complaints about the nativity scene.”
The controversy centers around a legal opinion issued by town attorney Morris Borea, which reportedly followed discussions about a Christmas tree display at the town library. Borea explained, “Research indicated to me that the scene by itself would likely raise a serious issue with regard to the Establishment Clause under the First Amendment.” He further stated that a standalone nativity scene could suggest government endorsement of Christianity, which could expose the town to legal challenges.
Borea’s December 21 letter to Town Manager Michael Paulhus outlined two alternatives for displaying the nativity scene. The first option allows for the nativity to be part of a larger, inclusive holiday display featuring nonreligious symbols. The second involves establishing a public forum policy that permits community groups to set up holiday displays at town property.
In response to the uproar, Republicans suggested that a compromise could have involved adding secular decorations to the nativity scene, rather than eliminating it entirely. They emphasized that the town council is expected to discuss policy changes in the near future to address this contentious issue.
Borea, who identifies as Catholic and appreciates the nativity scene, reiterated that the legal implications of a standalone display cannot be ignored. “Under our constitution and the way the courts interpreted it, government isn’t supposed to endorse one view over another,” he said.
As the debate unfolds, residents are left wondering how Plainville will navigate this sensitive issue and what the implications may be for future holiday displays. The town council is anticipated to convene soon to establish a clearer policy that respects both community sentiment and legal boundaries.
Stay tuned for more updates as this developing story continues to unfold.
